Response of deep soil moisture to land use and afforestation in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China

Yang, L., et al., 2012. Journal of Hydrology

Original research (primary data)
View External Publication Link

Abstract

Soil moisture is an effective water source for plant growth in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Characterizing the response of deep soil moisture to land use and afforestation is important for the sustainability of vegetation restoration in this region. In this paper, the dynamics of soil moisture were quantified to evaluate the effect of land use on soil moisture at a depth of 2 m. Specifically, the gravimetric soil moisture content was measured in the soil layer between 0 and 8 m for five land use types in the Longtan catchment of the western Loess Plateau. The land use types included traditional farmland, native grassland, and lands converted from traditional farmland (pasture grassland, shrubland and forestland). Results indicate that the deep soil moisture content decreased more than 35% after land use conversion, and a soil moisture deficit appeared in all types of land with introduced vegetation. The introduced vegetation decreased the soil moisture content to levels lower than the reference value representing no human impact in the entire 0-8 m soil profile. No significant differences appeared between different land use types and introduced vegetation covers, especially in deeper soil layers, regardless of which plant species were introduced. High planting density was found to be the main reason for the severe deficit of soil moisture. Landscape management activities such as tillage activities, micro-topography reconstruction, and fallowed farmland affected soil moisture in both shallow and deep soil layers. Tillage and micro-topography reconstruction can be used as effective countermeasures to reduce the soil moisture deficit due to their ability to increase soil moisture content. For sustainable vegetation restoration in a vulnerable semi-arid region, the plant density should be optimized with local soil moisture conditions and appropriate landscape management practices.

Case studies

Basic information

  • Case ID: INT-166-3
  • Intervention type: Created habitats
  • Intervention description:

    GTGP - Introduced pasture grassland - pasture alfalfa was planted in 2003 on sloped fields

  • Landscape/sea scape ecosystem management: Yes
  • Climate change impacts Effect of Nbs on CCI Effect measures
    Reduced water availability  Mixed results Soil moisture content (%) at different soil depths ( 0-1m, 1m-2m, +2m)
  • Approach implemented in the field: Yes
  • Specific location:

    The study site is located in the Longtan catchment (35°430– 35°460 N, 104°270 –104°310 E) in Dingxi, Gansu Province of China, covering an area of about 16.1 km2 with a highly fragmented land- scape with an elevation ranging from 1840 to 2260 m above sea le- vel.

  • Country: China
  • Habitat/Biome type: Created grassland |
  • Issue specific term: Not applicable

Evidence

  • Notes on intervention effectivness: The soil moisture profile in the traditional farmland was used as the reference to present the conditions prior to land useconversion. The difference in soil moisture between traditional farmland and the converted lands reflect the response of soil mois- ture to the change in land use. Mixed effectiveness because in one soil layer it had a positive effect on soil moisture but at lower depths it had a negative effect
  • Is the assessment original?: Yes
  • Broadtype of intervention considered: Another NbS
  • Compare effectivness?: No
  • Compared to the non-NBS approach: Not applicable
  • Report greenhouse gas mitigation?: No
  • Impacts on GHG: Not applicable
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on natural ecosystems: No
  • Impacts for the ecosystem: Not reported
  • Ecosystem measures:
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on people: No
  • Impacts for people: Not reported
  • People measures:
  • Considers economic costs: No
  • Economic appraisal conducted: No
  • Economic appraisal described:
  • Economic costs of alternative considered: No
  • Compared to an alternative: Not reported

Evaluation methodology

  • Type of data: Quantitative
  • Is it experimental: Yes
  • Experimental evalution done: In-situ/field
  • Non-experimental evalution done: Not applicable
  • Study is systematic:

Basic information

  • Case ID: INT-166-2
  • Intervention type: Created habitats
  • Intervention description:

    GTGP - Introduced shrubs on croplands with either David peach (Amygdalus davidiana) or Peashurb (Caranana korshinskii)

  • Landscape/sea scape ecosystem management: Yes
  • Climate change impacts Effect of Nbs on CCI Effect measures
    Reduced water availability  Negative Soil moisture content (%) at different soil depths ( 0-1m, 1m-2m, +2m)
  • Approach implemented in the field: Yes
  • Specific location:

    The study site is located in the Longtan catchment (35°430– 35°460 N, 104°270 –104°310 E) in Dingxi, Gansu Province of China, covering an area of about 16.1 km2 with a highly fragmented land- scape with an elevation ranging from 1840 to 2260 m above sea le- vel.

  • Country: China
  • Habitat/Biome type: Created other |
  • Issue specific term: Not applicable

Evidence

  • Notes on intervention effectivness: The soil moisture profile in the traditional farmland was used as the reference to present the conditions prior to land useconversion. The difference in soil moisture between traditional farmland and the converted lands reflect the response of soil mois- ture to the change in land use.
  • Is the assessment original?: Yes
  • Broadtype of intervention considered: Another NbS
  • Compare effectivness?: No
  • Compared to the non-NBS approach: Not applicable
  • Report greenhouse gas mitigation?: No
  • Impacts on GHG: Not applicable
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on natural ecosystems: No
  • Impacts for the ecosystem: Not reported
  • Ecosystem measures:
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on people: No
  • Impacts for people: Not reported
  • People measures:
  • Considers economic costs: No
  • Economic appraisal conducted: No
  • Economic appraisal described:
  • Economic costs of alternative considered: No
  • Compared to an alternative: Not reported

Evaluation methodology

  • Type of data: Quantitative
  • Is it experimental: Yes
  • Experimental evalution done: In-situ/field
  • Non-experimental evalution done: Not applicable
  • Study is systematic:

Basic information

  • Case ID: INT-166-1
  • Intervention type: Created habitats
  • Intervention description:

    GTGP - Afforestation on sloping croplands with either Chinese arborvitae, Chinese red pine, and Siberian apricot ... in 1980, 1972, and 1960, respectively planting density of the three types of forestland (Chinese arborvitae, Chinese red pine and Siberian apricot) was near 1900 plants/ha

  • Landscape/sea scape ecosystem management: Yes
  • Climate change impacts Effect of Nbs on CCI Effect measures
    Reduced water availability  Negative Soil moisture content (%) at different soil depths ( 0-1m, 1m-2m, +2m)
  • Approach implemented in the field: Yes
  • Specific location:

    The study site is located in the Longtan catchment (35°430– 35°460 N, 104°270 –104°310 E) in Dingxi, Gansu Province of China, covering an area of about 16.1 km2 with a highly fragmented land- scape with an elevation ranging from 1840 to 2260 m above sea le- vel.

  • Country: China
  • Habitat/Biome type: Created forest |
  • Issue specific term: Not applicable

Evidence

  • Notes on intervention effectivness: The soil moisture profile in the traditional farmland was used as the reference to present the conditions prior to land useconversion. The difference in soil moisture between traditional farmland and the converted lands reflect the response of soil mois- ture to the change in land use.
  • Is the assessment original?: Yes
  • Broadtype of intervention considered: Another NbS
  • Compare effectivness?: No
  • Compared to the non-NBS approach: Not applicable
  • Report greenhouse gas mitigation?: No
  • Impacts on GHG: Not applicable
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on natural ecosystems: No
  • Impacts for the ecosystem: Not reported
  • Ecosystem measures:
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on people: No
  • Impacts for people: Not reported
  • People measures:
  • Considers economic costs: No
  • Economic appraisal conducted: No
  • Economic appraisal described:
  • Economic costs of alternative considered: No
  • Compared to an alternative: Not reported

Evaluation methodology

  • Type of data: Quantitative
  • Is it experimental: Yes
  • Experimental evalution done: In-situ/field
  • Non-experimental evalution done: Not applicable
  • Study is systematic: