Single-species versus mixed-species community: which one is better for shore stabilization. A case study of Chongming Island, China

Du Q. et al., 2011. Ecological Engineering

Original research (primary data)
View External Publication Link

Abstract

There are five vegetation communities for shore stabilization on the southern coast of Chongming Island: a reed (Phragmites australis) community, a 4-yr-old Salix babylonica–Phragmites australis community (4Sb), an 8-yr-old S. babylonica–P. australis community (8Sb), a 4-yr-old Taxodium ascendens–Phragmites australis community (4Ta), and an 8-yr-old T. ascendens–P. australis community (8Ta). One major question is which is better for shore stabilization: the reed community (a single-species community) or 4Sb, 8Sb, 4Ta and 8Ta (mixed-species communities)? The soil stability index (K) and root length density (RLD) were selected as indicators for evaluating soil stability in response to water erosion. There are two main types of shore facing downward erosion and erosion scarp retreat along the southern coast of Chongming Island, and the erosion period may occur from March to August (scenario 1) or October to December (scenario 2). The assumed erosion period is scenario 1, and 4Sb is the most suitable plant community for preventing erosion scarp failure and mitigating shoreline retreat because it has the greatest K and RLD in the 20–50-cm deep soil layer among all of the vegetation communities within all intertidal zones. Additionally, 4Sb and 8Ta provide the best protection for reducing downward beach face erosion compared to the other vegetation types in the lower intertidal zone (LIT). At the middle intertidal zone (MIT) and higher intertidal zone (HIT), the reed community is optimal for protecting the shore face because it has the greatest K and RLD at 0–20-cm soil among the five vegetation communities in March–April and July–August within the MIT and HIT. Under scenario 2, 4Sb is still the most suitable type for reinforcing the scarp and preventing shoreline retreat. With respect to shore face downward erosion, 8Ta might provide the best protection for beach surfaces within the intertidal zones because it had the greatest K and RLD at 0–20-cm depth among the five vegetation types in November–December within the LIT, MIT and HIT.

Case studies

Basic information

  • Case ID: INT-233-2
  • Intervention type: Created habitats
  • Intervention description:

    INT 2: replant woody tree species into the current reed community…In 2002 and 2006, 2- yr-old Salix babylonica and Taxodium ascendens saplings were transplanted separately into reed communities along an intertidal gradient. This has resulted in the formation of four mixed-species communities: a 4-yr-old S. babylonica–P. australis community (4Sb), an 8-yr-old S. babylonica–P. australis community (8Sb), a 4-yr-old T. ascendens–P. australis community (4Ta), and an 8-yr-old T. ascendens–P. australis community (8Ta)

  • Landscape/sea scape ecosystem management: No
  • Climate change impacts Effect of Nbs on CCI Effect measures
    Coastal erosion  Unclear results Indicators of soil susceptibility and soil stability: soil stability index - measures the rate of dispersion of soil aggregates in water, and its magnitude can reflect the capacity of soil anti-erosion ability root length density (cm/cm3) - the total length of all roots within a unit soil volume … reflects plant root extension and entanglement in the soil body and promotes soil adhesion
  • Approach implemented in the field: Yes
  • Specific location:

    Chongming Island - southern coast

  • Country: China
  • Habitat/Biome type: Created wetland |
  • Issue specific term: Not applicable

Evidence

  • Notes on intervention effectivness: study focuses on comparing effectiveness between different NBS intervention types, testing to see which one may be the most effective. but there is no control or relevant no-adaptation comparator or baseline to assess the effectiveness of the intervention compared to absence of intervention therefore need to code 'unclear' for effectiveness
  • Is the assessment original?: Yes
  • Broadtype of intervention considered: Another NbS
  • Compare effectivness?: No
  • Compared to the non-NBS approach: Not applicable
  • Report greenhouse gas mitigation?: No
  • Impacts on GHG: Not applicable
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on natural ecosystems: No
  • Impacts for the ecosystem: Not reported
  • Ecosystem measures:
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on people: No
  • Impacts for people: Not reported
  • People measures:
  • Considers economic costs: No
  • Economic appraisal conducted: No
  • Economic appraisal described:
  • Economic costs of alternative considered: No
  • Compared to an alternative: Not reported

Evaluation methodology

  • Type of data: Quantitative
  • Is it experimental: No
  • Experimental evalution done: Not applicable
  • Non-experimental evalution done: Empirical case study
  • Study is systematic:

Basic information

  • Case ID: INT-233-1
  • Intervention type: Created habitats
  • Intervention description:

    The single-species vegetation area was a reed (Phragmites australis) community (established by the local Water Resources Bureau in the early 1950s)

  • Landscape/sea scape ecosystem management: No
  • Climate change impacts Effect of Nbs on CCI Effect measures
    Coastal erosion  Unclear results Indicators of soil susceptibility and soil stability: soil stability index - measures the rate of dispersion of soil aggregates in water, and its magnitude can reflect the capacity of soil anti-erosion ability root length density (cm/cm3) - the total length of all roots within a unit soil volume … reflects plant root extension and entanglement in the soil body and promotes soil adhesion
  • Approach implemented in the field: Yes
  • Specific location:

    Chongming Island - southern coast

  • Country: China
  • Habitat/Biome type: Created wetland |
  • Issue specific term: Not applicable

Evidence

  • Notes on intervention effectivness: study focuses on comparing effectiveness between different NBS intervention types, testing to see which one may be the most effective. but there is no control or relevant no-adaptation comparator or baseline to assess the effectiveness of the intervention compared to absence of intervention therefore need to code 'unclear' for effectiveness
  • Is the assessment original?: Yes
  • Broadtype of intervention considered: Another NbS
  • Compare effectivness?: No
  • Compared to the non-NBS approach: Not applicable
  • Report greenhouse gas mitigation?: No
  • Impacts on GHG: Not applicable
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on natural ecosystems: No
  • Impacts for the ecosystem: Not reported
  • Ecosystem measures:
  • Assess outcomes of the intervention on people: No
  • Impacts for people: Not reported
  • People measures:
  • Considers economic costs: No
  • Economic appraisal conducted: No
  • Economic appraisal described:
  • Economic costs of alternative considered: No
  • Compared to an alternative: Not reported

Evaluation methodology

  • Type of data: Quantitative
  • Is it experimental: No
  • Experimental evalution done: Not applicable
  • Non-experimental evalution done: Empirical case study
  • Study is systematic: